inicio mail me! sindicaci;ón

Manhattan 70 Princeton 60.

Box Score

Postgame audio - Coach Sydney Johnson:

Despite playing in a gym located at the top of Manhattan College's steep campus, It was an uphill battle for Princeton against the homestanding Jaspers on Sunday afternoon.

The Tigers fell behind 14-6 early and although they made several pushes to pull within one possession throughout the game, could never catch Manhattan.

"We were chasing the game, and that really makes it hard to get back into it," said Princeton head coach Sydney Johnson after his team's 70-60 loss. "We did, and then a couple other times down the road we couldn't turn the corner and that's been our season right now."

Tiger freshman Doug Davis’ career-best 27 points on 10-18 shooting was outshined by Chris Smith’s 35. Smith, the younger brother of Denver Nugget J.R. Smith, made his first seven jump shots on his way to 18 first half points.

"We made it tough on ourselves [early] in the sense that we were a little slow to react to Chris," Johnson said.

Smith's long two opened the scoring and after two free throws by Princeton's Patrick Saunders, fouled as he went up with a backdoor cut from Jason Briggs, Smith struck for the first time from the outside. Saunders dropped off Smith on the wing and Smith made the defense pay.

It was right move given the scouting report, but Smith was 4-5 from beyond the three point line on Sunday, despite coming into the game shooting 27.0% from the arc.

A drive by Princeton center Pawel Buczak, who finished with 15 points on 7-8 shooting, made the score 9-6 Jaspers. At the other end Smith rose up from well beyond the top of the arc to double Manhattan's lead and a scooping drive by Antoine Pearson pushed Princeton down eight.

Nick Lake popped a three from the top to bring the Tigers within 19-15 but Manhattan scored the game's next six points to establish a double digit advantage. A Darryl Crawford runner started this spurt and a flat-footed layup by Smith, the recipient of a touch pass from Andrew Gabriel finished it.

Davis came back in off the bench and immediately knocked one down from deep. Smith answered with a long jumper, but his toe was straddling the line. A second Davis basket, this of the midrange variety, made the score 30-26 with 3:26 left in the half. Manhattan scored the final three points before the break.

While Princeton had hung close, they were fortunate to only be down seven given how inconsistent their play had been on offense and on defense.

"We didn't really get a flow that we wanted," Johnson observed. "That's a credit to the coaching staff at Manhattan and their players."

Smith had 18 points at the midway point to lead all scorers.

The Tigers were better offensively in the second half, but could not slow down Manhattan when they had the chance to make things interesting.

Down four at the 16:23 mark after Buczak laid in a wrap-around pass on a Kareem Maddox drive, Gabriel scored inside to put Princeton down six.

Down five at the 11:28 mark after Davis sized up a deep three, Smith answered with a long jumper of his own.

Down three at the 9:44 mark after Davis knocked down his fifth three point shot using a Buczak screen, Mavraides was called for a tug on Smith as Smith tried to cut outside from under the basket. Smith converted both ends of his one-and-one opportunity.

"Defensively, our effort wasn't what it should have been," added Johnson. "If we solve that, I think we'll be in games and then we have to win the game."

Two free throws by Mavraides brought the Tigers within 48-45 and Princeton clamped down defensively, the shot clock ticking towards expiration as Tiger players cut off passing lanes and stayed in front of whichever Jasper had the ball. With the shot clock at one, Crawford had no choice but to heave one up high in the air from the right wing with Dan Mavraides in his face. The buzzer sounded as the ball was in flight and Manhattan's lead doubled when the deep three pointer was true.

Mavraides' look in close was blocked by Crawford, who quickly threw an outlet laser to Smith. Smith was ahead of the back and hammered home a dunk with his right hand to quickly build an eight point advantage with 8:16 to go.

The Tigers were down 53-47 on a soft Buzak hook and had two chances to cut down Manhattan's lead. Davis had a drive blocked and Mavraides controlled the rebound, but Mavraides' shot in the post rolled out.

Princeton could not get any closer and Manhattan's lead grew to a game-best 13 in the final minute.

The Tigers lost their fourth straight, the first of three consecutive road games that are the type of battles they need to win if they want to have success in Ivy League play this season. The league will prove a hard mountain to climb if Princeton can not perform at a higher level.

"I think we're going to be in games like this all season long, where we have a chance down the stretch to turn the corner," said Johnson. "We've just got to do it."

Notes:

-Princeton was 20-47 from the field (42.9%), 8-16 from deep (50.0%) and 12-18 at the line (66.7%). Manhattan countered with 23-46 shooting (50.0%), 5-10 for three (50.0%) and 19-31 from the stripe (61.3%).

-The Tigers outrebounded the Jaspers 33-25. Jason Briggs grabbed a career-best 11 boards for Princeton.

-Pawel Buczak committed five of Princeton's 11 turnovers.

-Freshman guard John Comfort scored his first field goal as a Tiger, connecting on a three point shot that concluded the scoring.

-Zach FInley and Buczak played on the floor together for a stretch of the first half. The duo was effective, as Princeton cut a 28-21 deficit down to four.

-Manhattan's leading scorer, Devon Austin, was 0-6 from the field and did not score until he converted two free throws with :37 left to play.

-Freddy "Sez" (pictured above), seen before Thanksgiving at Fordham, was again in the crowd on Sunday, wearing a customized Manhattan jersey that read "Freddy 1."

David Lewis said,

December 14, 2008 @ 8:10 pm

It's great to see Princeton compete game in and game out but the losing has to be tough to take. This isn't just Princeton. The rest of the league, inlcuding Penn, is losing as well. Why has Ivy basketball fallen so low? Manhattan is a good team but lost to RIder. Did Pete Carill ever lose to Rider? Carnegie Mellon? It may be that with all the additional exposure on TV, mid-major programs have improved. It could also be Princeton's early decision policy and the lack of scholarships has made it virtually impossible in today's basketball world to win a high percentage of non-league games. Unfortunately, Ivy League basketball is becoming Ivy League football - irrelevant. When was the last time that an Ivy team cracked the top 25, or the top 50 for that matter? When did they last have a competitive showing in the tournament? The hockey team is now in the top 10. There is no reason why the basketball team cannot compete nationally. The Ivy League presidents have to decide what they want. Right now, the League is dangerously close to losing its automatic bid and it has no one to blame but themselves.

Rodney Johnson said,

December 15, 2008 @ 6:50 am

When Finley and Buczak were on the floor together, who were the other three players?

Finley 4 fouls in 12 minutes PT!

The box score suggests that Buczak has really developed his game (other than the turnover issue). Any comments Jon?

Jon Solomon said,

December 15, 2008 @ 9:28 am

Rodney,

Finley replaced Saunders, giving Princeton a lineup of...

Finley, Buczak, Briggs, Mavraides and Lake.

Maddox and Davis replaced Mavraides and Lake.

Giving Princeton a lineup of...

Finley, Buczak, Briggs, Maddox and Davis.

Buczak came out for Lake with 1:42 left in the half, but Finley picked up his second personal foul ten seconds later and Buczak replaced Finley.

Jon

Michael Braun said,

December 15, 2008 @ 10:25 am

Once again, in the name of all that is good and holy, can we please stop panicking about losing the automatic bid? This is a possibility that lives only in the minds of certain Princeton fans, and has not been under serious consideration by the NCAA for nearly 20 years. Really, this is how runs on banks and hoarding of canned goods gets started.

As far as why Ivy basketball has fallen so low, there are several concrete explanations. For decades, the overall strength of the league was powered by Princeton and Penn, and usually one other team in the mix. Princeton's troubles are well-known (so can we please stop harping on problems of the last 4 years without recognizing the changes that took place in the interim?), and Penn is underachieving. Other schools like Yale and Columbia graduated key players last year. So it happens to be a down year for the league. But keep in mind that in 2006, Penn lost to Texas by only 8 in the tournament. In 2007, Penn was 22-9, and I think a #10 seed. Hardly ancient history for the league.

Rather than use the hockey team's recent success as a reason to put down the basketball program, I think of it as a beacon of hope. The hockey program reached unprecedented success under Cahoon, and then collapsed dramatically under Quesnelle. Sound familiar? Now, Gadowsky has the team back in the NCAAs. But it took him four years to do it. So let's all take a nice, deep breath and give this coaching staff a chance.

Facts are useful tools.

Rodney Johnson said,

December 15, 2008 @ 12:04 pm

To me the real problem in the Ivies is how to retain good coaches, not recruit good players. Coach Carrill never left for that lucrative contract at the next level. Carmody and JTIII left, as did Robinson at Brown and Dunphy at Penn. (Let's not include Scott in this mix).

Coach Johnson has the respect of the players, and I like his demeanor. The style of play seems to allow a little more freedom to the players. Next year's recruits look excellent.

My fear is that he wins the Ivy title, and then moves to the next level.

David Lewis said,

December 15, 2008 @ 3:18 pm

Michael,
Yes, "facts are useful tools." Right now the Ivy League is the third worst conference in the country based on non-conference winning percentage. If Penn and Princeton do not do well for the foreseeable future this downward trend will continue. Soon enough the Ivy League will be the worst conference in Div I. I don't care whether the NCAA has discussed it lately or not. Why does the League deserve an automatic bid? If the Ivies have the lowest RPI's they should lose the automatic bid until they play better basketball. The two worst conferences should have to play in to the tournament. Even if the Ivies continue to get an automatic bid, I don't want to see the Ivy champion get a 15 seed or worse and lose every year by double figures. I'm not "harping" on things that took place four years ago. I think that Coach Johnson is doing a great job and that things are getting a lot better. You obviously think that a new coach will solve all the problems. I hope you are right. I just think that the problems may be institutional. I'm just trying to find out if the basketball landscape is the same for the Ivy League that if was in the 1990s. Will Princeton ever have a team like 1998 again? Have things gotten harder or have Penn and Princeton gotten less competitive just because they lost great coaches? It just seems that mediocre mid-major programs from mediocre conferences now defeat Princeton on a routine basis - e.g. Rider, Manhattan. I think I heard that Rutgers has now beaten Princeton 10 out of the last 12 years. Is this an aberration or is it a trend that will continue until Princeton changes its recruiting rules. My point about hockey is just to show that the Ivy League can compete on a national level if it makes the effort. Cornell and Harvard usually field top 20 hockey teams on a regular basis. My problem with Ivy League basketball is the League now rarely has a team in the top 150. This is not merely a Princeton problem it's a League problem. I want to return to the 1980s and 90s. I'm just trying to find out if that's possible any more.

RSS feed for comments on this post

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.